Table 3 shows that with the exception of Pinx1, where there was a trend for higher expression in HCC, all shelterin and BTSA1 research buy non-shelterin genes remained underexpressed in HBV positive HCC Selleck Napabucasin without any significant difference between cirrhosis and HCC. These results suggested that at the telomere level, augmented TA and hTERT expression represent the major significant telomere deregulation distinguishing HBV-associated HCC from HBV-associated cirrhosis. Accordingly, comparison

of HBV-related HCC with non-cirrhotic liver samples demonstrated similar differences as the comparison of HBV-related cirrhosis with non-cirrhotic liver samples (Additional file 4: Table S4). Table 3 Cause-specific differences in telomeric gene expression between cirrhotic/fibrotic and HCC tissue samples   HBV HCV Alcohol       Cirrhotic and/or Fibrotic (n = 8) HCC (n = 10) p Cirrhotic and/or Fibrotic (n = 9) HCC (n = 10) p Cirrhotic and/or Fibrotic (n = 10) HCC (n = 10) p Shelterin POT1 0.0000

0.0000 ns 0.0125 0.0203 ns 0.0090 0.0060 ns PTOP 0.0000 0.0000 ns 0.0037 0.0064 ns 0.0055 0.0071 ns RAP1 0.0016 0.0000 ns 0.4210 0.5059 ns 0.4091 0.2538 ns TIN2 0.0018 0.0033 ns 0.0510 0.0581 ns 0.0804 0.0876 ns TRF1 0.0117 0.0209 ns 0.2271 0.1626 ns 0.2488 0.2886 MG-132 in vivo ns TRF2 0.0000 0.0000 ns 0.0061 0.0015 ns 0.0012 0.0012 ns Non Shelterin HMRE11A 0.0006 0.0000 ns 0.0627 0.0811 ns 0.0764 0.0536 ns HMRE11B 0.0008 0.0000 ns 0.0492 0.0508 ns 0.0886 0.0850 ns Ku70 0.0045 0.0024 ns 0.1704 0.2418 ns 0.1825 0.1645 ns Ku80 0.0033 0.0015 ns 0.1209 0.1494 ns 0.1316 0.0853 ns NBS1 0.0002 0.0024 ns 0.0304 0.0317 ns 0.0403 0.0501 ns RAD50 0.0002 0.0000 ns 0.0091 0.0118 ns 0.0108 0.0101 ns TANK1 0.0005 0.0000 ns 0.0788 0.0761 ns 0.0945 0.0869

ns TANK2 0.0000 0.0006 ns 0.0188 0.0255 ns 0.0127 0.0171 ns Pinx1 0.0001 0.0049 ns (0.054) 0.0083 0.0107 ns 0.0219 0.0165 ns Telomere deregulation at the late stage of HCV-associated hepatocarcinogenesis HCV-associated HCC expressed higher levels of the Ki67 proliferative marker (6% versus 1%) than peritumoral cirrhotic tissue samples but the difference was not statistically significant. When compared to their peritumoral cirrhotic tissue samples, many HCV positive HCC expressed higher amounts of hTERT transcripts (p = 0.54) and hTR (p = 0.021) and they displayed increased TA (p = 0.036) when compared with HCV positive cirrhosis (Figure 1A). The TRF length was shorter in HCV-associated cirrhosis than in HCC but the difference was not statistically significant (5.1 kbp versus 6.6 kbp, p = 0.39) (Figure 1A). Table 3 shows that the pattern of shelterin and non-shelterin genes expression was not significantly different between HCV-associated HCC and HCV-associated cirrhosis. Western-blot analysis confirmed qRTPCR results (Figure 2B,C, and D).