We believe that in some circumstances, small expression differences in multiple genes acting in the same signalling pathway could serve as a valuable biomarker

of diabetogenic process. Unexpectedly, the biggest differences in gene expression GSI-IX ic50 profile were found between the group of healthy relatives (DRLN) and the control group. Several of those differentially expressed immunorelevant genes are those regulating inflammation and innate immune responses. Data presented in this study suggest that predisposition to T1D can be generated by the action of myriad of genes with only a slightly altered gene expression levels. Thus, healthy, autoantibody-negative first-degree relatives of patients with T1D are predisposed to react inadequately to certain environmental and/or endogenous stimuli owing to their genetically controlled bias towards enhanced proinflammatory responses. However, in normal circumstances, the https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bay80-6946.html propensity for such responses in these subjects seems to be counterbalanced by the opposing action of the regulatory

T cells [14] or by other mechanisms [45], keeping chronic inflammatory responses on low levels. For this reason, vast majority of genetically predisposed people to autoimmune diabetes can stay healthy for entire duration of his/her life. However, in some cases, when the inflammatory responses are exacerbated and/or the regulation of negatively acting circuit is insufficient, the initiation of autoimmune processes leads to the production of

autoantibodies and insulitis. As this process might employ distinct and much smaller set of genes, the whole-genome expression profile stabilizes, resembling rather a ‘normal’ landscape of expression profile. The other possibility is that once beta-islet autoimmunity is initiated and the pancreas becomes a target for lymphocyte infiltration, PMBCs with proinflammatory attributes are depleted from the circulation and/or home to the pancreas and pancreatic draining lymph nodes, thus becoming invisible for their detection in the peripheral blood. This scenario could explain why significant differences in gene expression profile are observed between DRLN and DRLP PRKACG groups. From this point of view, DRLN seems to be a suitable target for discerning vital information about genes with immune and/or non-immune importance and their potential role in the initiation of molecular processes leading to the development of T1D. Once DRLN subjects became autoantibody positive (DRLP), most gene expression–related differences disappear. Results of this study and in particular the conclusion that non-specific immune processes and proinflammatory milieu are essential for the establishment of destructive insulitis are in agreement with conclusions from previous reports that provided an analogous insight into T1D pathogenesis [10, 12–14].