, USA), anti-Caspase-3 antibody (1:200) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Co., Runcorn, UK), anti-TGF-β1 antibody (1:100) (Zhongshan, Co., Beijing, China), anti-Col-IV antibody (ready-to-use kit) (Bo Shide, Co., Wuhan, China) and anti-FN antibody (1:50) (Zhongshan, BGB324 mw Co., Beijing, China), respectively. After incubation with second antibody immunoglobulin (Shanghai Changdao, Co., Shanghai, China), the sections were stained with diaminobenizidine (Maixin Bio, Co., Fuzhou, China). The positive area of PHB, Caspase-3, TGF-βl, Col-IV or FN in renal tissue was measured. During evaluation of the interstitial areas, fields containing

glomerular parts were ignored. All of the evaluations were performed by two of the authors blinded to the experimental code. Renal tissue was homogenized and total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Beijing Tiangen, Co., China). Ultraviolet spectrophotometer measuring absorbance, agarose gel electrophoresis confirmed that there had been no degradation of RNA by visualizing the 18S and 28S RNA bands under ultraviolet light.25,26 Primers were designed LY294002 datasheet according

to primer design principles by Primer Premier 5.0. The primers for PHB and internal control β-actin were as follows: F 5′-TGGCGTTAGCGGTTACAGGAG-3′ and R 5′-GAGGATGCGTAGTGTGATGTTGAC-3′ for PHB; F 5′-GCCCCTGAGGAGCACCCTGT-3′ and R 5′-ACGCTCGGTCAGGATCTTCA-3′ for β-actin. One microgram total RNA from the renal tissue of each rat was reverse transcribed into cDNA with an ExScript RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Dalian, China). PHB and β-actin were amplified with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Beijing Tiangen, Co., China). Gene expression of β-actin was also measured in each sample and used as an internal control for loading and reverse transcription efficiency. The analysis for each sample was performed in triplicate. The average threshold cycle (Ct, the cycles of template amplification to the threshold) was worked out as the value of each sample. The data for fold change was analyzed using 2−ΔΔCt.25,27 For example, the ΔΔCt for PHB mRNA expression in GU group at 14 days was as follows: ΔΔCtPHB, 14 day, GU group = (CTPHB,

14 day, GU group − CTβ-actin, 14 day, GU group) − (CTPHB, 14 day, SHO group − CTβ-actin, 14 day, SHO group), and the fold change for PHB mRNA expression in GU group in 14 day was 2−ΔΔCtPHB, 14 day, GU group. The data were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Independent-Samples DNA ligase T-test was performed to determine the differences between the SHO group and GU group, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationships between the indicators for detection. A value of P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package for social studies SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). More collagen deposition, fibroblast proliferation and diffuse lymphocyte filtration in the renal interstitium of GU group were observed when compared with those in the SHO group (Fig. 2).