Type 3 VWD accounted for the largest number: 34 www.selleckchem.com/products/bgj398-nvp-bgj398.html (57.6%). Table 2 summarizes, by bleeding indication, characteristics for the study group including frequency of bleeding before and during prophylaxis; usual dose in U VWF:RCo/kg and the median number of infusions during prophylaxis. Overall, the median (IQR) rate of bleeding episodes in the year

prior to prophylaxis was 12 (6–24), compared with a median (IQR) rate of 3.6 (0.96–9.4) during prophylaxis. In the case of occurrences of heavy menstrual bleeding, the changes represent a reduction in the number of days or intensity of bleeding with each cycle. In the year prior to prophylaxis, the median number of cycles in which heavy menstrual bleeding was reported was 12, compared with four per year during prophylaxis. While Table 2 presents the median numbers of bleeding episodes before and after prophylaxis for the group overall, perhaps more meaningful are the percent reductions within individuals that occurred during the period of evaluation (Fig. 1). Differences in annualized bleeding rates within individuals (during prophylaxis – before prophylaxis) were significant for the total group (P < 0.0001), and for those with primary indications of epistaxis (P = 0.0005), joint bleeding (P = 0.002) and GI bleeding

Imatinib order (P = 0.001), and of borderline significance (P = 0.055), for those in the category of ‛‘other’ indications. The within-individual difference in the group whose primary indication for treatment was abnormally heavy bleeding at menstruation (n = 4)

was not significant (P = 0.25). When we examined the effect of prophylaxis by age for subjects <18 (n = 26), and those ≥18 (n = 33), we found that it was similar in both groups. The median within-individual number of bleeds per year after prophylaxis compared with before was significantly lower, P < 0.0001 in both groups. A primary indication MCE公司 of joint bleeding occurred somewhat more frequently among those <18; however, GI bleeding and menorrhagia were not reported as the primary bleeding indication for prophylaxis for any subjects in that age group. Epistaxis was almost twice as likely to be the primary indication for prophylaxis among those <18 compared with those aged ≥18 years (32.0% vs. 16.7%). While the specifics of individual bleeding episodes were not available for all bleeds in the year prior to and following onset of prophylaxis, a total of 604 bleeds were reported. Of these, 529 (87.6%) were treated with a VWF-containing concentrate. The most commonly used products were Humate P, 77.1% (CSL Behring GmbH); Fandhi, 16.5% (Grifols); and Alphanate, 4.5% (Grifols). A review of reasons for inpatient and outpatient hospitalizations, and supplemental comments on study data collection forms revealed no reports of thrombotic events among those in the study group.