There is a possibility that SEB contributes to SSTI, and therefore to MRSA spread in the community. To our knowledge, this is the first isolation of SEB-positive ST5 MRSA. Although the New York/Japan ST5 clone was occasionally positive for the arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME)-arcA (data not shown), two ST5 strains were negative for the arcA gene. The New York/Japan clone has been isolated not only in hospitals, but also from children in the community (14, 15). In Japan, children are frequently treated as outpatients at hospitals near their homes, so it is conceivable that some such children carry the New York/Japan clone to their

homes from hospitals and that transmission of such MRSA occurs among their family members, because MRSA colonizing their nares has also been detected on their hands (2). Probably reflecting such situations, we detected the New York/Japan clone (and its variant) Stem Cell Compound Library manufacturer in samples from the straps and handrails of trains in this study. MRSA with genotype ST8/spa606(t1767)/SCCmecIVx (unknown subtype)/CoaIII is a major CA-MRSA that is associated not only with SSTI, but also with invasive infections in the community in Japan (2). This clone with the typical genotype (strain PT5) and its variants with spaNew (t986) (strains PT3 and PT4) were isolated in this study (Table 1, Fig. 1). Similarly to clinical isolates (e.g., strain NN4): (i) they were positive for SaPIm1/n1; (ii) they exhibited low degrees

of oxacillin and imipenem resistance (MICs, 64

and <  2  μg/mL, respectively); and (iii) they were resistant to a limited number of antimicrobial agents, such as gentamicin (many CA-MRSA strains are resistant to gentamicin selleck screening library in Japan [2]). Since the three strains (PT3 to PT5) were isolated from different trains, we concluded that either ST8 CA-MRSA is circulating in trains or that Amisulpride ST8 CA-MRSA spreading in the community has appeared in trains. One ST8 MRSA (strain PT6) was slightly divergent from previously described clinical isolates and not closely related to the ST8 reference strain (NN4) (Table 1, Fig. 1). Similarly to CA-MRSA (consistent with NN4): (i) it exhibited the genotype ST8/spa606/agr1/CoaIII; (ii) it exhibited low degrees of oxacillin and imipenem resistance (MICs, 4 and <  0.06  μg/mL, respectively); and (iii) it was resistant to a limited number of antimicrobial agents (including chloramphenicol, which is rarely used in humans); however, (iv) it exhibited SCCmecI, which is generally associated with HA-MRSA (3, 10). Therefore, bacteriological assignment as CA- or HA-MRSA was impossible for strain PT6. ST88 MRSA and ST89 MRSA are representative CA-MRSA and are isolated from bullous impetigo and positive for the causative toxin, exfoliative toxin (A for ST88, and B for ST89) (2). Although ST88 MRSA (strain PT7) and ST89 MRSA (strain PT8) respectively resembled ST88 and ST89 clinical isolates from bullous impetigo (Table 1 and Fig. 1), they lacked exfoliative toxin.