Further,

Further, participants were informed that they have to fill out three questionnaires for anxiety measurement and that they will be allocated to one of two groups (experimental group vs. control group). At T1, after providing demographic information and written consent, participants filled out the STAI (Laux et al. 1981). Subsequently, participants were familiarized with the machine for the objective measurement of

the BDORT and we tested the individual Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical MVC of the participants. Following this, participants were asked to think of a situation in which they had experienced their anxiety. When participants confirmed that they had a situation in their mind, they had one minute to self-generate this Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical emotion and to indicate the intensity of anxiety on the buy PD-0332991 corresponding LS. Immediately afterwards, participants put their thumb and index finger in the machine for the objective measurement of the BDORT and performed six measurements of the force of the finger musculature (90% MVC) under the emotion of anxiety, with breaks of 30 sec in between each of the six trials. The moment in which the machine generated the pulling force was announced by an acoustic signal 3 sec in advance. From that moment on, participants were asked to hold the ring of index finger and thumb together with their maximum Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical force and go on with self-generating

the emotion. After one trial, participants were asked to relax their fingers in the machine until the next acoustic signal but go on

with self-generating their anxiety in the rest intervals between the trials. Participants completed six trials under the emotion of anxiety. The participants had been randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical after T1. Two weeks after T1, the experimental group received only one single intervention (about 1–2 h) with the wingwave method by a qualified wingwave coach and the control group received no intervention. Further 2 weeks later, at T2, participants were asked to fill out the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical same questionnaires and to perform the same physical task as in T1. The 25 participants in the experimental group were randomly allocated to five different qualified wingwave coaches, who were comparable in relation to years of expertise with the wingwave method, and thus, each wingwave coach conducted an intervention with this method with five participants. The procedure Etomidate for T2 was the same as described above for T1. Data analysis All consent forms containing identifiable information were kept completely confidentially and separately from the completed questionnaires, which were only identifiable by an allocated ID number. First, we assessed participants’ intensity of anxiety (measured by a 9-point LS ranging from no anxiety to most anxiety) in relation to their anxious memory in both groups and for both times of measurement. Therefore, data were analyzed using a 2 (group: experimental group vs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>