Examination of the supportive Th cells revealed a spectrum of Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-type cytokines. I.m. immunization influenced the production of Th17 cell responses, further supporting the notion that LTN can be used as a molecular adjuvant for vaccine to Libraries enhance protective immunity against plague. In mice immunized Imatinib concentration with LTN DNA vaccine by either i.n. or i.m. route, Ab responses to F1- and V-Ag began to increase by wk 6. Although three DNA immunizations were insufficient to elevate the anti-F1- and -V-Ag Ab responses, robust Ag-specific responses were induced in mice nasally boosted with F1-Ag protein.

These results were consistent with previous observations that DNA immunization effectively primes the host [25], [36] and [37], and the combination of DNA and protein immunizations

offers one means to effect optimal immunity to plague. Our results also showed that i.n. and i.m. LTN DNA vaccinations provide sufficient priming effect on induction of immunity to F1- and V-Ag in the peripheral immune compartment, resulting in improved efficacy when compared to nasal application of recombinant F1-Ag alone. Thus, LTN DNA vaccines provide effective priming that ultimately leads to protective immunity against plague. The stimulation of neutralizing Abs when using LTN adjuvant was less apparent when applied nasally. Nasal LTN DNA vaccinations conferred less protection than the same vaccines given by the i.m. route. These results were unexpected, since we previously showed that Salmonella-based [27] and IL-12-based DNA vaccines [25] check details were effective against pneumonic plague challenge. Our results also showed, although serum Ab responses to F1- and V-Ag between i.n. and i.m. LTN DNA-vaccinated mice were similar after boosting with F1-Ag protein, found Ab responses induced during the priming phase by the nasal LTN DNA vaccines were slightly lower than those Abs obtained by i.m.-vaccinated mice. Moreover, nasal immunization with LTN/F1-V produced less robust nasal Ab responses when compared to mice similarly immunized via the i.m. route. Although there did appear to be some tissue specificity, the

cytokine analysis revealed the Th cell responses to V-Ag in the nasally DNA-immunized mice were dampened, particularly the Th1 cell responses, when the same Th cell responses were compared to i.m.-immunized mice. Such differences could account for the dampened efficacy by the nasally immunized mice. Thus, the molecular adjuvant, LTN, when given as a DNA vaccine, seems to perform better when given parenterally and provides better protection against pneumonic plague than the same vaccines given nasally. These data differ from that previously shown for the LTN protein when applied nasally with Ag [24]. No differences in IgG subclass responses were observed in mice nasally vaccinated with LTN DNA vaccines. However, IgG1 and IgG2a anti-F1-Ag responses were significantly greater than IgG2b responses in i.m.-immunized mice with LTN/V-Ag and LTN/F1-V DNA vaccines.