Double-stranded RNA produced by transposons, replicating viruses, or regulatory noncoding micro-RNAs is recognized by the endonuclease Dicer and cleaved into fragments called siRNA. A multienzyme complex, which includes Argonaute 2 (AGO 2) and the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), binds to siRNA duplex and discards the sense strand to form and activated complex containing the antisense strand. The AGO2-RISC complex then targets an mRNA Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical strand sharing a complementary sequence and leads to its degradation, shutting down protein expression [4]. After iRNA demonstration in mammalian cells in 2001, it was quickly realized that this highly specific Nutlin 3a mechanism of sequence-specific gene

silencing might be harnessed to develop a new class of drugs that interfere with disease-causing or disease-promoting genes [5]. One of the most important advantages of using Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical siRNA is that, inhibitor Lapatinib compared to antisense oligonucleotides, siRNA is 10–100-fold more potent for gene silencing [6]. To date, the production of effective gene delivery vectors is the bottleneck

limiting the success of gene-based drugs in clinical trials. The development of siRNA delivery systems may progress faster than the design of DNA carriers. Indeed, separation of small fragments of dsRNA from its carrier is easier than the delivery of a plasmid from the same carrier. Furthermore, when siRNA is released into the cytoplasm, as it has lower molecular Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical weight than plasmid DNA, it diffuses faster in the crowded cytosol. The target of siRNA is located in the cytosol, rather than in the cell nucleus, so a nuclear barrier does not exist for Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical siRNA delivery

[7]. Moreover, several studies have demonstrated increased efficiency of RNA transfection relative to DNA transfection in nondividing cells [8] and in human primary melanocytes [9]. The major limitations against the use of siRNA as a therapeutic tool are its degradation by serum nucleases, poor cellular uptake, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and rapid renal clearance following systemic administration. Although many siRNA carriers have been reported for in vitro applications, these delivery systems are usually GSK-3 inappropriate for in vivo use. Most of the siRNA-based therapies that have entered into clinical trials imply local delivery such as the intravitreal or intranasal routes. However, systemic delivery of siRNA for anticancer therapies, for example, depends on the development of effective nanocarriers for siRNA systemic administration [6, 10–12]. The ideal in vivo delivery system for siRNA is expected to provide robust gene silencing, be biocompatible, biodegradable and nonimmunogenic, and bypass rapid hepatic or renal clearance. Furthermore, an ideal delivery system should be able to target siRNA specifically into the tumour by interacting with tumour-specific receptors. Nanocarriers that are defined as submicron (ranging from 1 to 1000nm) offer great advantages to fulfill these requirements [6].