83) [15] and 22 (R = 0.80) years of follow-up [16]. This tracking pattern of aBMD is thus maintained over six decades of adult life. Such a notion has two important implications. First, the prediction of hip fracture risk based on one single measurement of FN aBMD remains reliable in the long term [15, 16]. Second, within the wide range of FN aBMD values little SHP099 solubility dmso variation occurs during adult life in individual Z-scores or percentiles.

Hence, it can be inferred that bone mass acquired by the end of the growth period appears to be more important than bone loss occurring during adult life [17]. This tracking pattern of FN aBMD was also reported in healthy females, from prepuberty to peak bone mass attainment [18–20]. In fact, since PBM is under strong genetic influence Abemaciclib supplier [21–23], it can be expected that bone mineral density and size are found to significantly track TSA HDAC datasheet during growth in healthy populations throughout the world [18, 20, 24–26]. Growth in infancy was reported to be associated with BMC in later life [27]. The risk of hip fracture in elderly was shown to be related to early variation in

height and weight growth [28, 29]. Very recently, in a study of 6,370 women born in Finland, reduction in body mass index (BMI) gain between 1 and 12 years of age was associated with an increase risk of hip fracture in later life [30]. Two potential explanations for this link between reduction in Z-score for BMI and later fracture risk are Mirabegron discussed by the authors: first, a difference in pubertal

timing; second, a slowing of growth in response to adverse environmental influences [30]. The authors concluded that thinness in childhood is a risk factor for hip fracture in later life, by a direct effect of low fat mass on bone mineralization or represents the influence of altered timing of pubertal maturation. In this study, the timing of puberty as precisely assessed by prospectively recording menarcheal age, was not determined [30], making uncertain whether this important determinant of FN PBM and subsequent premenopausal FN aBMD [12] could be implicated in this association. In the present report, we tested the hypothesis that variation in body growth during infancy and childhood are related to pubertal timing which, in turn is a determinant of FN peak bone mass. Data are presented on the relationship between menarcheal age and body weight (BW), height (H) and BMI from birth to 20 years, and in FN aBMD prospectively measured from prepuberty to maturity in a cohort of healthy females. In addition to FN PBM measurements, we also analyzed whether the impact of BMI as linked to pubertal timing was detectable on bone strength related microstructure, as assessed by high resolution peripheral computerized tomography (HR-pQCT) at the level of distal tibia. Subjects and methods Participants We studied 124 healthy women with mean (±SD) age of 20.4 ± 0.6 year.