01 K which houses a cylindrical copper shell as the sample container. The typical data-taking time for a given frequency scan over the full range is 30 min. After each scan, the suspension is shaken in an ultrasonic shaker before the next run begins. Using relation and , we obtain the ξ NF for the nanofluid given as [19] (2) In addition to the effusivity ξ NF, we also find the thermal conductivity κ using

the frequency dependence of the temperature oscillation δT 2ω . The δT 2ω for a line heater has a total width of 2b dissipating power P L /unit length and immersed in a PKA inhibitorinhibitor liquid [20]: (3) where K is the integration variable, , refer to the solid (substrate-carrying heater) and the liquid, respectively. The value of the interfacial resistance is expressed as R interface ≈ 6.1 × 10−7 m2 K/W [20]. From Equation 4, it can be shown that the frequency dependence of Doramapimod supplier δT 2ω has a logarithmic dependence on f whose slope is given as [21] (4) We also determine the specific heat C p of the base liquid and the nanofluids using a differential scanning calorimeter, operating in modulation mode (with frequency <10 mHz).

Results and discussions Change in thermal effusivity in the addition of stabilizer The representative data on the detected temperature oscillation δT 2ω as a function of frequency is shown in Figure 2. It shows the typical δT 2ω data for ZnO-PVP nanofluids. From this data, we do the analysis of thermal conductivity of respective nanofluids. Figure 2 Typical temperature oscillation δT 2 ω as a function of frequency measured in PVP-stabilized ZnO nanofluid. In selleck screening library Figure 3, we show the effusivity ξ NF = C p κ of the base fluid ethanol along with two nanofluids:

the bare ZnO nanofluid as well as the ZnO nanofluid with stabilizer PVP. The data for the base liquid ethanol are also shown. The parameters Phospholipase D1 are obtained from Equations 2 and 4 using the measured data. Both the nanofluids have the same volume fraction of 1.5% and have similar average particle size. Figure 3 Frequency dependence of effusivity of base liquid ethanol, bare ZnO nanofluid, and PVP-stabilized ZnO nanofluid. The enhancement of ξ NF in the nanofluids, at low frequency, compared to that in ethanol is clearly seen. Importantly, it is observed that the enhancement in the bare nanofluid (without stabilizer) is much larger compared with that in the nanofluid with the PVP stabilizer. The results are summarized in Table 1, where we show the enhancement of the effusivity ξ = C p κ as a ratio taken with respect to (wrt) the base fluid as determined from the analysis of the signal. The low-frequency-limiting values for ξ were used for the parameters in Table 1. Table 1 Comparison of thermal parameters for nanofluids as measured by two methods Quantity/method Bare ZnO nanofluid ZnO nanofluid with PVP Relative enhancement of effusivity ξ = C p κ wrt ethanol/from 3ω method using 4.0 2.