Kendall’s rank correlation (τ) was used to test the strength of an association between expression of genes. Pearson’s χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test were used to test for https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ly333531.html contingency between dichotomized values of basal keratin expression (negative and positive) and values of other histopathological parameters. All results were considered statistically significant when two-sided p was less than 0.05. Results In 73 cases (63,5%) identified

immunohistochemically as being CK5/6-negative, mean CK5 gene expression was significantly lower, than in cases classified by immunostaining as being CK5/6-positive (table PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor 3 cost 3, p = 0,001). Similar results were observed for CK14 and CK17 (p = 0,007 and p < 0,001, respectively; table 3). Table 3 mRNA

of respective basal keratin genes depending on their status assessed by immunohistochemistry Status by IHC mRNA level p value   Median; range Mean ± SD   CK5/6 negative 24.69; 0.00-4495.16 206.67 ± 727.20 0,001 CK5/6 positive 192.92; 0.00-3066.48 424.48 ± 731.51   CK14 negative 67.50; 0.00-6615.26 209.45 ± 684.34 0,007 CK14 positive 250.52; 0.00-10569.08 1480.20 ± 2958.21   CK17 negative 0.15; 0.00-22.22 0.69 ± 2.47 <0,001 CK17 positive 1.15; 0.01-26.44 3.11 ± 5.49   The comparisons between dichotomized values of CK5-mRNA level and CK5/6 immunohistochemical status demonstrated, that despite the method of dichotomization and statistical learn more analysis, there were cases with discordant results comparing immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR analysis. For two methods of dichotomisation (quartiles and based on ROC; the ROC curve analysis was performed assuming that immunostaining was a reference test), there were still 48-55% cases, which were CK5/6-immunopositive, but were negative by mRNA examination. Similarly, 14% of cases were negative on immunohistochemical examination, but presented high mRNA levels. Similar discordances were observed for CK14 and CK17. Highly

significant, moderate, positive correlations between mRNA levels of CK5 and CK14 (τ = 0.40, 95%CI 0.29-0.51, p < 0,001), between CK5 and CK17 (τ = 0.51, 95%CI 0.40-0.62, p < 0,001), and between CK14 and CK17 (τ = 0.36, 95%CI 0.25-0.47, p < 0,001) were observed. When samples were divided Isoconazole in respect of basal keratins status on the basis of immunohistochemistry, significant difference in ER-mRNA level between positive and negative ones was found. We also observed significant relationship between basal keratin expression and ER status, when both were estimated by immunohistochemistry. Tumours positive for these keratins usually lacked ER receptor (table 4, 5). To the contrary, basal keratin mRNAs did not correlate with ER mRNA levels. When a group of 53 cases samples positive for basal keratins on the basis of mRNA assessment was selected, there was no significant difference in mean ER-mRNA level when compared with negative ones.